On 20 Dez., 16:18, Naked Robot <[email protected]> wrote: > specifically, does it use the openCV version of surf?
I doubt it. It's derived from panomatic, which is a SURF implementation, but rumour has it it's different and a 'gradient-based approach'. I have failed to find out more about it (maybe I just haven't dug deeply enough) which is a shame because I think the algorithm used is very good indeed :) > i just found this comment > herehttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/1318691/surf-and-sift-alternative-... > > " > Just wanted to comment that with the latest version of OpenCV the SURF > implementation has been rewritten to utilize Intel Threading Blocks. If > your execution device has more than one core, the speedup is incredible > (much faster than OpenSurf) – > Diego<http://stackoverflow.com/users/152541/diego> Feb > 19 at 23:22 that's a good hint. And it's in reach: openCV has python bindings, so does hugin. A hugin plugin can pass image data to openCV's latest SURF implementation and receive keypoints/CPs back without even leaving the same application. It's even quite feasible to make the detector pluggable, so one could play around with different algorithms more easily than writing a whole C++ program. Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
