Geoff, with properly calibrated sensors and a decent sensor fusion algorithm, you should be able to get 0.1º accuracy, I think. But that's the expensive stuff.
For cheap uncalibrated sensors without any sensor fusion, the results will be bad - 5º or more. On Monday, January 9, 2012 12:26:32 PM UTC+1, Geoff G8DHE wrote: > > Well its never going to be accurate enough to act as a final template, > that's to be sure! The current sensors will give a ±5° which is sufficient > to place the image in the rough location, ready for aligning. But if we > don't start he ball rolling then there will never be demand for cheaper > more accurate sensors to be provided or used ! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
