On 19 Apr., 22:36, Bruno Postle <[email protected]> wrote:

> I recently added a new tool called 'ptomorph' to Panotools::Script
> that helps with stitching Hugin panoramas with parallax errors.
> ...
> I'd like to hear some feedback, do you
> think something like this would be useful in Hugin?

Bruno, this is very good!

I tried it today with a scan of a map. I had 8 individual images, and
because the map had been folded and I couldn't get it totally flat, I
couldn't get the stitch right. There were jumps by up to about 10
pixels, and the result wasn't really good enough. So I thought that
since I actually had flat images which were merely distorted and not
parallax errors your tool might be perfect for the purpose. It was.
The stitch from the pto your tool generated came out near perfect, I
could only see 1-2 pixel errors in areas which weren't covered by CPs,
close to the edge, on the black frame lines of the map; inside the map
image I couldn't detect a single fault.

I think 'useful in Hugin' is a gross understatement. I haven't yet
unleashed it on a 'real' panorama, but I sure will soon and report on
that as well, and it looks like the others who have tested it have had
good results, too.

Thanks
Kay

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to