I have the raw file but when Picasa sync with web site, it automatically 
converts them to jpg and strips the EXIF.  I'll see if there's a way to 
include the EXIF.

On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 8:00:04 AM UTC-7, Jan Martin wrote:
>
> Is it just me, or is there really no way to get the original images with 
> EXIF intact?
> Also I do not want to download 100 images one by one.
>
> Jan
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:48 PM, ecs1749 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I set the number of CPU down to 1, still fails after 6 photos (4948 bit 
>> wide each).  If I reduce the resolution of each photo to 1600 (268kb file 
>> size each), I can load 140+ pictures no sweat.  At a resolution of  3200 
>> bits wide and I was able to load close to 100 photos before it fails.
>>
>> If anybody wants to try, the pictures are located at:
>>
>>
>> https://picasaweb.google.com/116295145477369704246/HuginTest?authkey=Gv1sRgCPeHl_-Wmci06QE
>>  
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:16:27 PM UTC-7, Steeve wrote:
>>>
>>> >>"An error happened while loading image :  caught exception: bad 
>>>  allocation" 
>>> Hasn't this problem already been discussed on this newsgroups? 
>>>
>>> In summary on computers with multiple cores/processors images are 
>>> being loaded in parallel which consumes too much memory.. The error is 
>>> not coming from the memory which is currently being used, but from the 
>>> additional memory it wants to allocate.. You can find a better 
>>> explanation by search the newsgroup for "bad allocation" 
>>>
>>> The workaround was to reduce the number of CPUs Hugin uses.. 
>>>
>>> In Hugin look at file->preferences-> number of CPUs. On my machine 
>>> this was set to 4 I had to reduce it to 1. 
>>>
>>> With 4 I'd typically get this error after 10 images (I've got a 
>>> smaller camera sensor) 
>>> With 2 I'd still occassionally got this error 
>>> So I end up having to reduce this to 1. 
>>>
>>> Regards 
>>> Steve 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 30, 5:01 am, ecs1749 <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>> > For my case, this is the newly available 64 bit version of Hugin (w 
>>> new 
>>> > GUI), running under Windows 7, 8G of real memory, plenty of disk space 
>>> for 
>>> > temp, and the max amount of memory used by Hugin appears to be less 
>>> than 
>>> > 1.5G.  The failure occurs with ramdon set of photos at widths of 4948 
>>> bits 
>>> > each.  Most cases I tried, the failure occurs after a handful of 
>>> pictures - 
>>> > around 4 to 5.  The error message simply says " "An error happened 
>>> while 
>>> > loading image : 
>>> >  caught exception: bad  allocation".   If I scale the pictures down to 
>>> 1087 
>>> > bits, there is no issue.  I can process over a hundred files no 
>>> problem. 
>>> >  What else info can I provide to help? 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 2:53:12 PM UTC-7, Bart van Andel wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> > > It would help if you provide a *detailed* description of when things 
>>> go 
>>> > > wrong instead of just saying "Hugin crashes". Which version, which 
>>> OS, 32 
>>> > > or 64 bit, amount of RAM, *specific error message*, all of those may 
>>> > > matter. Moreover, giving incorrect information (which you did, I 
>>> guess not 
>>> > > purposefully but nonetheless) can steer your fellow group members in 
>>> the 
>>> > > wrong direction. Being precise can save everyone some time - and a 
>>> little 
>>> > > frustration. Please keep that in mind. 
>>> > 
>>> > > Also, I asked which program crashed a couple replies back. Please do 
>>> read 
>>> > > answers carefully when people are offering you a hand. We are all 
>>> > > volunteers here. 
>>> > 
>>> > > Could you try to see which image the cp generators are crashing on 
>>> > > exactly? If you find it, you may want to post it somewhere so we can 
>>> have a 
>>> > > look at it. Maybe one of your images is broken which may cause all 
>>> kinds of 
>>> > > unexpected behavior. 
>>> > 
>>> > > -- 
>>> > > Bart 
>>> > 
>>> > > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:02:36 PM UTC+2, ecs1749 wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> > >> Yes, I have done both and still fails.  Incidentally, the failure 
>>> is not 
>>> > >> when loading the images.  It's when detecting control points.  I've 
>>> tried 
>>> > >> changing detectors and they all fail the same fashion (some sooner 
>>> than 
>>> > >> others). 
>>> > 
>>> > >> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:09:06 AM UTC-7, Stefan wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> > >>> On 27.05.2012 20:28, ecs1749 wrote: 
>>> > >>> > I downloaded the 64 bit version for Windows 7 and tried to load 
>>> photos 
>>> > >>> > at full resolutions (width 4948) .  Can only load 4 photos 
>>> before 
>>> > >>> > running into the dreadful "An error happened while loading image 
>>> : 
>>> > >>> > caught exception: bad  allocation".  I have plenty of free 
>>> memory - 
>>> > >>> > according to the Task Manager. 
>>> > 
>>> > >>> Have you tried to increase the image cache memory setting in the 
>>> Hugin 
>>> > >>> Preferences dialog? Are you sure you have enough free disk space 
>>> in your 
>>> > >>> TEMP directory? 
>>> > 
>>> > >>> With kind regards 
>>> > 
>>> > >>> Stefan Peter 
>>> > 
>>> > >>> -- 
>>> > >>> In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In 
>>> > >>> practice there is.
>>
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
>> A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
>> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to