Hello Bruno,
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 07:21:24 +1000, Bruno Postle <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri 13-Jul-2012 at 18:45 -0700, Terry Duell wrote:
Experimenting with Shepard's distortion and polynomial distortion, I
find that when using the polynomial the control points are not written
to the resulting pto file. Is this an oversight?
It took a while to remember why I did this. The morph moves features
about in the source images, this is quite predictable with the Shepard's
distortion, so ptomorph rewrites the control point locations to suit -
If you open up the new project in Hugin then the control points will be
in the right place.
The position of features with the polynomial distortion is not so
predictable, as it is done in ImageMagick, so I just delete the control
points since I don't know where to put them anyway.
OK, I understand.
I had hoped to be able to have a closer look at how the different
distortion methods affected regions around a control point to get a better
idea of which distortion method might be best suited to deriving an
improved psf for the blur/sharp problem. Not to worry, a bit of
experimenting may provide the answer.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
