On Saturday, 21 July 2012 at 22:36:27 -0700, Tduell wrote: > Greg, > > On Sunday, July 15, 2012 5:16:43 PM UTC+10, stativ wrote: >> >> On 15 July 2012 09:03, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>> >>> Thanks. I don't have time to try them now, but the patch for 1.5 >>> looks exactly like what I would expect. Is anybody working on getting >>> them into the enblend/enfuse repository? >> >> The fixes are already in the repository for more than a year, but a >> new version was not released yet (IIRC because of some artifacts that >> were not present with 4.0). >> > Have you had any joy with building enblend 4 on your x86_64 system?
Yes, it's working fine now, and it has eliminated some artefacts I saw with enblend 3.1. > I had tried to build the current source (4.1), hoping to do a bit of > testing, but ran into problems using cmake, and wondered if you have > been using cmake with v4.0 and how it was working for you. This was 4.0, and if I understand Lukà s' messages correctly, things have changed since then. I used GNU make, not cmake. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger [email protected] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua
pgpLyKTggKG78.pgp
Description: PGP signature
