Hmm, not sure why my previous message got deleted. Here it is again:
Thanks, Carlos. Aligning the resulting equirectangular projections is indeed an option, but I was hoping to find a way to do it within the stitching process, to avoid loosing any quality by double-processing the source images. Something like, solve one panorama, and then use its orientation and CPs as a constraint to solve the others. Is something like that possible? Thanks again, lensfun On Monday, September 10, 2012 5:18:53 AM UTC-7, Cartola wrote: > > Have you tried to align them after they are finished? Don't know if this > is the best option, but I did it in this case here: > > http://wp.me/p1AGa0-ih > > The second picture was taken more than one year after the other and I > aligned the two equirectangular at the end. I did it manually into hugin, > but it is probably an easy task to automate. > > Cheers, > > Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola) > http://cartola.org/360 > http://www.panoforum.com.br/ > > > > 2012/9/10 panfun <stuffa...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > >> Hi, >> >> I just started using hugin recently, and while I've been reading a lot, I >> could use some help/guidance from the experts here. >> >> Case at hand: >> I have multiple 360 panoramas, taken from the same position, at different >> times of day, using a motorized head. >> However, there are slight rotation differences between each set of >> pictures (and probably the whole rig moved a little bit). >> >> I have a papywizard template that I've used to set up a generic .pto to >> read in Hugin. Now, I can go in and add CPs, optimize, etc, and get a good >> panorama for each one of the sets, but if I do each one separately, they >> are all slightly different (in rotation, but also different areas get >> warped differently). >> Ultimately, I'd need all panoramas to line up perfectly with each other. >> >> Ant tips for the best way to go about that? I've tried extracting >> rotation differences for each set, and then using that to modify the master >> .pto file to create a "rotated" one for each set. But by the time I add CPs >> and optimize, I still get panoramas that don't line up with each other. >> >> Help! and Thanks! >> >> panfun >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. >> A list of frequently asked questions is available at: >> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ >> To post to this group, send email to hugi...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> hugin-ptx+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx