I was hoping I'd have better results than I am. I think I require more understanding.
I have several 360x180 images stitched from six cameras. The cameras were stable relatively, but rotated globally. I want to correct the rotation in all images so as to match the first in camera orientation. I took my first image in the sequence and aligned the second to it using hugin. After removing the roll, pitch, yaw values it added for the first image I asked it to optimize positions, which gave me a rpy for the first image of 0,0,0 and a rpy for the second image (1/30th of a second in time later) of -0.508, -1.08, 0. I applied this to the original pto that created the second image and used nona and enblend to stitch it again. The resulting image is not aligned with the first image. Am I misunderstanding something or making an incorrect assumption? Further, if this should be expected to work with the right incantation, I'd like to further modify image 1 so it is aligned how I'd prefer, then align the rest to match it. This seems to be troublesome as hugin only seems to look at the 2d image as given, rather than a translated image as defined by the lens projection and hfov. That is, it can't tell the something at one of the poles of my equirectangular image matches something in the center of a different image, as the control points only seem to look at the pre-projection image. This is probably the least of my issues, though. At the following URL you can find a file containing the first three frames. The folder "ideal" contains how I'd like the images in "compares" to look. The folder "stock" contains my next best (but totally acceptable) alignment target. http://res0l.net/StratoSphere/stratoalign.tar.gz Any sage words would be appreciated. Thanks Caleb On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Caleb Anderson <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Sunday, July 29, 2012 3:55:26 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote: >> >> >> Yaw is simple, you just increment the y values for each photo in the >> project file. For any combination of roll, pitch and yaw, there is >> a transform-pano tool in the Panotools::Script perl module that can >> do the calculation for you: >> http://search.cpan.org/dist/**Panotools-Script/bin/**transform-pano<http://search.cpan.org/dist/Panotools-Script/bin/transform-pano> >> >> -- >> Bruno >> > > Thanks Bruno. I'm about ready to start applying this information. Here's a > sample of what I'm going for: > https://plus.google.com/107235276879849058634/posts/GYACShuG7KX > > And I once again find myself butting up against the manual CP placing > process. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
