> > If it's valid information, then why doesn't the TIFF output include > it? Indeed, if it's valid information then NOT having it in the TIFF > output is a bug; either way, there is a bug in one of the outputs. >
Ah, well, you never actually said it was doing anything like that - I thought you were just mad that the offsets were in there. At first glance, then, this sounds like GIMP has got it wrong. It should * expand* the canvas to the top and left, not shift the image within the existing canvas. And this page <http://docs.gimp.org/2.6/en/gimp-images-out.html> seems to confirm it: *Unfortunately, PNG offset support in GIMP is broken*, or at least is not compatible with other applications, and has been for a long time. As Bruno stated the default TIFF output *does *have offsets, but I've never seen any image editor honour them (nor would I really expect any to do so). David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
