OK,
I've done that as well with great results
I asked because I got the idea you were using unconverted 48 bit files.
John

On Monday, December 10, 2012 10:20:32 PM UTC-6, GnomeNomad wrote:
>
> Yes. My DSLR shoots 48-bit RAW files. I convert them to 16-bit TIFF 
> using RawTherapee. Hugin reads the resulting TIFFs just fine. 
>
> TIFF is an interesting format, because it's designed to be very 
> flexible. Everything from 2-bit (true B&W) on up. A very large selection 
> of compression algorithms (including JPG, IIRC). Layers. 256-bit alpha 
> transparency. All capabilities that I think predate this thing called 
> the Internet ... 
>
> Anyway, I have no idea what Hugin can read and write. Maybe developers 
> can clue us in? 
>
> On 12/10/2012 12:40 PM, JohnPW wrote: 
> > So GN, 
> > (Sorry, I'm not sure I follow) You are using 48b tiffs as source images 
> > for Hugin to stitch panoramas? 
> > What are the specs for acceptable input and output files for Hugin? 
> > I just spent 40 minutes trying to find some kind of Hugin tech spec list 
> > and have now given up.( I do understand Hugin uses  chain of underlying 
> > programs.) 
> > Just curious, 
> > John 
> > 
> > On Friday, November 9, 2012 9:26:09 PM UTC-6, GnomeNomad wrote: 
> > 
> >     On 11/09/2012 01:52 AM, dex Otaku wrote: 
> >      > Salut alouest, 
> >      > 
> >      > On Thursday, 8 November 2012 14:01:32 UTC-6, alouest wrote: 
> >      > 
> >      >     'm using a sotware which can export RGB tiff and 32 bit tiff. 
> >     I can 
> >      >     produce panoramic with hugin of the RGB but not of the 32 bit 
> >     tiff. 
> >      >     If I extract both RGB and 32 bit tiff, then I create my 
> panorama 
> >      >     from the RGB pictures and save the project file. 
> >      >     Would I be able to use all the settings (and control points, 
> >      >     basically everything) used before and apply them to my 32 bit 
> >     tiff 
> >      >     that hugin see totally blank? 
> >      >     I tried quickly with nona but it crashed. 
> >      > 
> >      >     To summary could hugin or another tool could apply the 
> >     settings from 
> >      >     a working panoramic creation into empty tiff (they off course 
> >     have 
> >      >     the exact same extent). 
> >      > 
> >      >     Is that crazy or that could work? 
> >      > 
> >      > 
> >      > To my knowledge, Hugin and its included tools only work with TIFF 
> >     images 
> >      > that: 
> >      > * use 16 bits per colour channel or less [no 32bpc TIFF, no 
> floating 
> >      > point TIFF], 
> >      > * are RGB or RGBA [no CMYK support], 
> >      > * use only a single image layer [no multi-layers TIFF support], 
> >      > * and must be <4GB in file size [a limitation of base-standard 
> TIFF] 
> > 
> >     Yes. I understand there's an effort to come up with a TIFF standard 
> >     that 
> >     allows larger sizes. 
> > 
> >      > What are you using that creates 32-bit [I assume that's per 
> colour 
> >      > channel] output? HDR images from something? 
> > 
> >     I don't know what the original poster means by it. Windows claims a 
> >     32-bit image format, but I think it's actually 8-bit RGB with 8-bit 
> >     alpha-transparency. 
> > 
> >      > Is there a practical reason to maintain that bit depth as far in 
> >     your 
> >      > processing chain as Hugin? Chances are, even if you're going to 
> be 
> >      > post-processing the images after stitching, 16 bits per channel 
> >     will be 
> >      > sufficient. 
> > 
> >     I get better color when I stitch using 48-bit TIF (16-bit per 
> channel). 
> >     I convert them from my camera's 48-bit RAW files. 48-bit is minimal 
> >     HDR, 
> >     because 16-bits per channel gives a greater color gamut than can be 
> >     displayed or printed with existing technology. 
> > 
> >      > My suggestion [which is probably your only option with Hugin, 
> Nona, 
> >      > etc.]: reduce the bit depth of the images to 16bpc or less and 
> >     use those 
> >      > with Hugin. If you require >16 bit per channel image support, you 
> >     may 
> >      > need to find other tools to use. 
> > 
> >     I know of one Hugin tool that doesn't work with 16-bit per channel 
> >     images: linefind. Unless that's been fixed in the new release? 
> > 
> >      > Cheers, 
> >      > D 
>
>
> -- 
> Gnome Nomad 
> [email protected] <javascript:> 
> wandering the landscape of god 
> http://www.clanjones.org/david/ 
> http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/ 
> http://www.cafepress.com/otherend/ 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to