This looks like it was enfused. Enfusing stacks then stitching is helpful (rather than stitching before infusing. If you have abundance of overlapping images, picking the most compatible ones is helpful. Also using the mask feature to steer where the seam is placed or which image to use for an overlap is also very helpful. John
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 6:58:29 AM UTC-6, rew wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have the impression that the table is the most problematic. > i.e. when a "bad seam" might happen on the floorbords it doesn't > matter as much. Maybe it's possible to force hugin to use only one (or > a select few) image(s) for the table. I have the impresion that it's > using too many different table-shots. > > Roger. > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:24:04AM -0200, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho > (Cartola) wrote: > > You can also post edit with some advanced image editor to correct them > but > > it can take many hours. Some scenes mainly those without many "human > lines" > > are easier to stitch and less sensible to parallax. The main reason for > > that is that in fact the parallax errors are there but you cant see > them. > > Nature sky water sand forests and other things can be easily shoot > without > > a tripod head. The shorter distance also increase the problem. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola) > > http://cartola.org/360 > > http://www.panoforum.com.br/ > > > > > > > > 2012/12/12 Matias Tukiainen <[email protected] <javascript:>> > > > > > Thanks for the quick response! Since every other scene besides that > one > > > seems to have gone just fine without a proper panoramic head, I guess > I'll > > > just have to reshoot that scene and maybe move the table a bit closer > to > > > the open cupboard or temporarily remove it from the room alltogether. > > > > > > -matias > > > > > > On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 1:33:54 PM UTC+2, [email protected]: > > >> > > >> 12.12.2012 13:09, Matias Tukiainen kirjoitti: > > >> > > > >> > Here's the scene in question: http://i.imgur.com/nwM8v.jpg > > >> > > > >> > It was shot with a Canon 5DMKIII and a 20-35mm lens using the 20mm > > >> focal > > >> > length and just a regular stative head. > > >> > > >> > Is it possible to > > >> > somehow make the table and the sheets look nice by control point > > >> > adjustment or should I go and shoot the scene again, perhaps > slightly > > >> > further from the table so lens distortion doesn't affect it so > much? > > >> > > > -- > ** [email protected] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 > ** > ** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 ** > *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* > The plan was simple, like my brother-in-law Phil. But unlike > Phil, this plan just might work. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
