On 6 November 2013 01:01, Terry Duell <[email protected]> wrote: > I tried stitching your 0007 and 0008.tif in hugin-2013.1.0 (development > source) and they stitched OK using your .pto, but the result, when > displayed in "Gimp" (I think Gimp actually opened the image up in UFRaw) > looks very similar to what you showed. "Shotwell" also displayed the result > very poorly. >
> The result does display OK in "image viewer" (fedora), and "Darktable". > Your input images are 16 bit, and you have output set for tif in your > .pto, which means output is also 16 bit. The viewers which show the stitch > poorly cannot, or do not, handle 16 bit correctly. This is an old Gimp/ufraw problem, 16bit TIFF files get passed to the ufraw plugin even though the standard Gimp TIFF plugin handles them properly. A solution is disable 'automatic detection' when using Gimp File->Open; with Gimp 2.6 there is an option to 'Select File Type', scroll down and pick the TIFF handler. (my solution was to switch to Darktable and/or Rawstudio) -- Bruno -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAJV99ZiqGVZyH5m17_ALEbfVZT2sQrbLD%2BVnYqhq%3DYBG2oRWkQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
