Hi, Am Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2014 18:32:15 UTC+1 schrieb Cartola: > > Well, I don't know if the problem is me, but I don't remember of making a > good auto set of CPs ever. I've always wanted to be able to make it find > more spread ones. > > Some samples of mine are available at the links below. They are not the > ones used at this last time, which are for a job and I guess I can't share. > They are very similar: fish eye lens with many geometric lines at the scene. > > Mainly the RANSAC steps has problems with these sets. It rejects too much control points. But increasing the RANSAC distance helps for these examples: cpfind --ransacdist=100 and it find cp in all images (inclusive nadir) and the cps show a nice distribution (in my opinion). Maybe these is some small bug in the RANSAC code. I have not look into it yet. When I find time I will have a look, but I can not promise anything.
Thomas -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/8b457982-7ecd-4e4c-b531-927539d21233%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
