On 03/12/2014 02:06 AM, Brandan wrote:
Any thoughts on less cores with a faster speed, or more cores with less
speed per core? It seems to me, I have not checked that there are still
some things hugin does that only use one core, so a faster dual core
speed would be better than quad core with slower cores. *I hope the
question makes sense as I really have little idea what I am talking about
Hugin uses multiple cores when analyzing images. Enblend and enfuse use
only a single core.
I use Hugin on 2 machines. One has an AMD 2.8GHz Phenom III (4 core).
The laptop has a 4th gen 2.4GHz Intel i7 (4 core, 8 core with
hyperthreading). Both are running Debian Sid Linux. The laptop seems to
render images faster.
--
David W. Jones
[email protected]
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/5320B915.2000607%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
