Terry, that is always something I strongly advocate; RTFM. But you'll have to let me know which magic FM you're using. ;o) I also believe however that most manuals are great as reference documents but not good from a learning point of view. I've done my best learning by following this group's emails and thanks to guys like you for the effort and time you put into helping us. My "art of photography" has improved a lot because of what I'm now able to do with hugin (even on a single image to correct perspective, etc.).
Certainly once one understands that an option such as --no-ciecam exists it is eventually possible to find it documented somewhere. But there is no easy link in one's mind from "crappy colours" to "oh, I need an enblend option"! Let me highlight the searching I've done so you folks can let me know what I'm doing wrong with the hugin and/or multiblend documentation. If you're referring to the manual that comes up when one uses the "Help" - "Help" menu item (F1 or fn F1) then you have to do a lot of digging to find enblend options ... "stitcher tab", search for enblend, click on "hugin preferences" link, search for enblend heading, click on "enblend" link ... and ... nothing there about an option --no-ciecam! Is there a better FM somewhere? If one does a google search on "enblend options" the first entry goes to: http://enblend.sourceforge.net/enblend.doc/enblend_3.2.xhtml/index.html; with no mention there of --no-ciecam. Perhaps these web pages could be updated to always point ahead to whatever the latest version of the software is; I know it isn't hugin's fault that google does a bad job of finding the latest version of enblend. The second entry goes to: http://enblend.sourceforge.net/enblend.doc/enblend_4.0.0.xhtml/Extended-Options.xhtml; no --no-ciecam. Any links to http://wiki.panotools.org cause a "technical difficulty" error (links also offered up by google). I finally did a search on 'enblend "--no-ciecam"' and found: http://enblend.sourceforge.net/enblend.doc/enblend_4.1.xhtml/Extended-Options.xhtml that contained the answer. But, I had to first know that this was an option for enblend. So, I did my home work and read lots of material but I only knew about --no-ciecam because of this email group. As to the multiblend options, again how does one's mind leap from "crappy colours" to "oh the red and blue channels are reversed" (I hope my mind isn't too far off the norm on this!!!). The web site: http://horman.net/multiblend/ doesn't list -h (help) and I don't think I'd have thought to use --bgr to swap the RGB order. To use -h I have to go to terminal and it wouldn't be easy from within hugin. Should this be reported as a bug in multiblend in that it is reversing colour channels? On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:28 PM, Terry Duell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:10:21 +1100, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Of course I do! ;o) And how would one have figured that out? >> > > When all else fails RTFM...use "multiblend -h" :-) > > Cheers, > -- > Regards, > Terry Duell > > -- > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > ---You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.xc1ymeburs0ygh%40localhost. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/F87DADEF-FD2E-4D50-9541-FE1727108ACC%40accesscomm.ca. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
