I wonder then if anyone can tell me what I'm doing wrong, because I'm getting extremely different results every time. I have a template for the camera orientations which I'm setting via pto_var, but would like to fine-tune that via control points. I'm running the following script on a set of 8 images:
#! /bin/sh FOV=125.2430276873036 pto_gen --projection=0 --fov=$FOV -o project1.pto "$@" pto_var -o project1.pto --set y0=-2.0,r0=-91.0,p0=4.5,y1=142.7,r1=-88.5,p1= 3.8,y2=88.7,r2=-87.0,p2=0.4,y3=135.0,r3=-88.0,p3=-3.3,y4=179.0,r4=-89.0,p4=- 1.8,y5=225.0,r5=-92.0,p5=-3.0,y6=266.8,r6=-95.0,p6=-0.0,y7=312.0,r7=-93.7,p7 =1.2 --opt y,p,r project1.pto cpfind --prealigned -o project1.pto project1.pto cpclean -o project1.pto project1.pto linefind -o project1.pto project1.pto autooptimiser -l -n -o project1.pto project1.pto > /dev/null pano_modify --projection=2 --fov=AUTO --center --canvas=AUTO --crop=AUTO -o project1.pto project1.pto pto2mk -o project.mk -p pano project1.pto make -j 12 -f project.mk all On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:48:18 PM UTC-7, Spencer Egart wrote: > > I'm stitching images via script, and have noticed that every time I run it > I get a slightly different final pano. I'm making sure to delete any old > intermediate .pto files beforehand, so it's not that. > > Are any of the tools in Hugin (autooptimiser, cpfind, etc.) based on > random/non-deterministic algorithms? If so is there a way to seed the RNG > or in some other way ensure reproducible results? > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/5c2947a4-82a8-4c85-b33e-a85f414b360b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
