On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 04:26:04 +1100, T. Modes <[email protected]> wrote:
Beside the unconnected image there is another issue with this project:
the images in each stack are connected by control points. But at the
same time the position of the images in each stack is linked. Please use
only one of this:
* Either use control points between the images of each stack. Then allow
the position of each image in the stack to be optimized (do not link
them).
* Or link the position of the images in the stack. In this case don't
assign control points between the individual images of each stack.
But not both at the same time. This is probably too much for the
optimizer.
Having pondered a bit on this project, I came to a similar conclusion.
I would reckon that a good approach for a project of this size (number and
depth of stacks), would be to pre-align each stack (align_image_stack),
which with a bit of shell scripting magic could make use a bit of parallel
processing, then align and stitch the stacks linked by position.
This is something which might be better done within hugin, and would be
good GSOC project if we can ever get back into that.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/op.xuv4thjwrs0ygh%40localhost.localdomain.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
