> > Just wondering why do you not like pto_gen? I installed hugin on a debian box- raspberry pi- and pto_gen is missing, so I was looking for alternatives. I was able to use match-n-shift and albeit the output was not 100% the same it was close enough to make it work.
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 3:37:44 AM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 8:16:06 AM UTC-7, Emiliano Burgos wrote: >> >> >> I want to know if it would be possible to not use pto_gen by modifying >> the command sequence and getting the same output. In the wiki >> <http://wiki.panotools.org/Panorama_scripting_in_a_nutshell#PanoTools_.27Scripting.27> >> >> I read that you can use something like autopano-sift: >> > > If you want to use a control point detector other than the default some of > them will take the images as an input and give you a pto file. The downside > of that at least for me on my newer computers is that most of the other > control point detectors no longer work, or I am not able to find them. The > default one is pretty good though there are times when it is good to know > how to change the default options on it. > > Just wondering why do you not like pto_gen? > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/557c8dc7-3e84-491c-803b-c6f520fb220a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
