On Sunday, June 14, 2015 at 4:29:15 AM UTC-4, dex Otaku wrote: > > Hi Christopher, > You might improve this by using the --wrap option of enblend. Add --wrap > to the enblend parameters on the stitch page in the main hugin window. > See also: panini-renderer; search for 'panini' on sourceforge. That tool > might let you rotate and rerender more easily*. > > Thank you Dex for the helpful advice. "--wrap" looks like just the sort of thing for this sort of problem, especially since "--wrap=horizontal" is the default and correct parameter to --warp for this situation.
Unfortunately, embarrassingly, it seems I asked the wrong question. I turns out that the "exposure discontinuity" I complained about, is rather a consequence of the fact that the leftmost and rightmost ~40 pixels of my input image are ignored from each edge. On a hunch, I resized my 3584x1792 input image to 2048x1024, ran the same process in hugin, and got a beautiful perfect reprojected image out. Thus I suspect something in the process is silently grumpy about the 3582x1792 image size. I will investigate this some more. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/c4a8cf40-e134-429f-9482-7e27e1a4f6ce%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
