On 21 October 2015 11:25:38 BST, bugbear wrote: > >As such, the lighting (just an archive room) was not only non uniform, >but the map was in a different place (relative to the lighting) for >each >session. In this example, the visual discontinuity "just happens" >to be on a session boundary. > >So - what's the best that can be done with this flawed >data?
In this situation you need to calibrate vignetting and camera response separately - then only optimise exposure and white balance in a project where shadows move around. -- Bruno -- Bruno -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/5250AA66-7DC3-48B9-800B-9E5D79E81452%40postle.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
