The problem with your "quadrant" plan may be down to the order you supply the images on the command line. It may be that each image must be connected to the previous images. So if you had 9 images:
ABC DEF GHI And you supplied them in the order A,B,C,H... enblend might be able to blend A,B,C but when it comes to H there is no overlap (yet). If you supplied them instead in alphabetical order, the blend might be successful. The full set may be okay because presumably you are supplying them in the order you shot them, in some kind of continuous/snaking grid pattern. NB Enblend's output differs depending on the order images are supplied on the command line. On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 10:41:59 UTC, bugbear wrote: > > I've written a perl script to "chop up" the blend; > unfortunately, doing a quick low res test run, one of the quadrants > reported: > > enblend: info: loading next image: mapped/big0103.tif 1/1 > enblend: info: loading next image: mapped/big0102.tif 1/1 > enblend: warning: failed to detect any seam > enblend: mask is entirely black, but white image was not identified as > redundant > enblend: info: remove invalid output image "1x0sub.tif" > > So I didn't get my quadrant output. > > And yet the "full set" of images blends OK. > > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/f0388ea3-983a-49aa-a608-d13fc5ebe48e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
