On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 16:24:22 +1100, Terry Duell wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:11:50 +1100, Terry Duell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> When loaded the images are assumed by Hugin to be from a rectilinear >> lens, is that correct? > > I just tried making the images 'full frame fisheye' and CPFind > automagically found 15 CPs, although some of those were in the sky. > Attached .pto and screenshot of the Fast Panorama Preview from 'positions, > view and barrel' optimisation. > Hope that helps.
Yes, that helps a lot to localize the issue. I've tried it that way with the same (small) imagees. Again, CPFind finds 15 control points, though the Photos tab recognizes the images as fisheye. If I optimize with Positions (Incremental, starting from Anchor) I get an average of 5.4 and a max of 12.7, though it positions the image across the border. But if I choose Positions, View and Barrel distortion, I get ridiculous values (all less thn 0.0001) and a useless image. Either way these are completely different results from what I got using the Assistant and Align, which is how I did it before. By comparison they're almost usable. What platform are you doing your tests on? Is it practicable for me to try your binaries? Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger [email protected] for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20160126054408.GD93488%40eureka.lemis.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
