Am 25.07.2018 um 15:05 schrieb [email protected]:
I am using a free service. Downside is that the 2.5 GB will expire there after 
48 hours. Files from a Parrot Anafi drone flight are here:

https://mab.to/baXC9ntbt

It would have been easier if you included only the images that belong to the panorama. At least 1/3 of the jpg images don't.

As was to be expected for an aerial panorama the images suffer from severe parallax. They can't be used to say anything about lens correction. Lens correction optimization is only possible, if the camera and lens was rotated exactly around the entrance pupil of the lens, the no-parallax-point.

If the images don't align it's not the lens correction model which is to blame, it's parallax! Even worse: As soon as there is parallax the optimizer will try to use lens correction parameters to minimize control point distances for points that are misaligned due to parallax.

Nevertheless it should be possible to stitch a nice panorama, you have plenty of images with large overlap and good features to choose from in order to avoid alignment problems.

The lens should be treated as a full frame fisheye, though. Otherwise the b parameter gets too high.

--
Erik Krause
http://www.erik-krause.de

--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/cd44bdea-0e6a-25e1-0a56-109fbe3fe8ad%40gmx.de.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to