I used jpgs because they cost much less memory, which could be important when you have dozens of photos per end panorama. Since each jpg should cover at least 8 stops of exposure, so spacing them a single stop from one another should allow for adequate interpolation - or however hdr merging works. Basically it should be enough.
Regardless, it didn't work with TIFF either. To my knowledge each raw-exported tiff was 16 bit, but end result is basically the same. There is less of the grey, but still too much - and the fact it has underexposed spots in the shadows (admittedly it could be due to people moving under the stand) it looks like the restored areas are consequence of shifting the overall exposure. https://www.dropbox.com/s/iqg0t088p039dyc/artefact_brightness2.JPG?dl=0 I just need to know if this can be fixed in hugin, Or Luminance. Maybe i'm completely wrong and I need to make only 3 images spread at +-2 (which didn't work last time but who knows, maybe next time). -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/71173ec0-4576-4088-8bc9-250065e6549e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
