On 31 March 2020 09:15:33 BST, 'ChameleonScales' wrote:
>Nevertheless, if this required a new kind of distortion, do you think
>it could be considered for a new feature ?

Have you tried optimising the angle of view of the input photos? This is 
something that Hugin does really well, it is very unlikely to conclude that a 
180° panorama is actually 90°, mainly because it is very difficult to fit a 
180° panorama into the very different curvature of a 90° space and vice-versa - 
this is why just scaling positions and angle of view of the input photos isn't 
enough to scale the final panorama.

-- 
Bruno

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/8273E826-FAD9-41A0-A0DD-C11689112063%40postle.net.
  • [hugin-ptx] ... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software
    • Re: [hu... Bruno Postle
      • Re:... Bruno Postle
        • ... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software
          • ... Klaus Foehl
            • ... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software
          • ... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software
            • ... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software
              • ... Bruno Postle
                • ... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software
    • [hugin-... Abrimaal

Reply via email to