As I understand it, metadata is not 100% reliable for Hugin. But what are the 
main reasons ?
Is it due to:
- the device not knowing the lens you put on it?
- the device simply not having very precise metrics?
- mechanical imprecision in how the shutter and other components move when 
capturing the photo?
- slight deformations in the device components at manufacturing time or after 
prolongated use or shocks?
- something else?

Note that this is more out of curiosity than anything else. I don't have a 
particular problem with it (at the moment).

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/ZHgsF3-F0UWoj-8efJ041HiY7mexs-ecLfiQ6o0SohD5YFeqCgF1i5QRfMsKASD5Z39jgw2pOKiLy92JhWKPbI_-3hjrfCHQ2Nyiv39e0b0%3D%40protonmail.com.
  • [hugin-ptx] ... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software
    • Re: [hu... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software
      • Re:... Gunter Königsmann
        • ... David W. Jones
          • ... Harry van der Wolf
    • [hugin-... FabKzo
    • [hugin-... Erik Krause
      • Re:... 'ChameleonScales' via hugin and other free panoramic software

Reply via email to