Thanks for the response, but I don't thnk that was the case; the source images were in proper proportions - the image I uploaded was cut by hand (mouse) through windows' snapping tool. Image variables were set to 360 degrees on all layers.
The gaps that appeared at the edges of the source files were corrected by setting --coarse-mask variable in enblend options. The other thing is that even when I aligned the layer by hand (+ Apply), I think the position was reset for the end exr file. At first I thought my manual realignment was inadequate but I'm not sure anymore. Hugin seemed to have a problem with realigning one layer to the rest in equirectangular mode, so I had to go back to the original unstitched* files. I don't think Hugin supports dual-view circular fisheye cropping so I separated them into individual files. This gave me the option to set the view angle per lens/view to manufacture's specifications, i. e. 190 degrees. After setting up control points manually the panorama stitched with proper overlap. Some new gaps formed at sun's location, but I believe this is only due to the same issues I had previous years. *For clarification - the mentioned original files from the camera come as a single file including two separate views from both lenses. These files were usually converted to blended equirectangular images by manufacturer's software. On Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at 5:48:25 PM UTC+2, T. Modes wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, 31. Mai 2020 22:03:30 UTC+2 schrieb Matija Kogoj: >> >> P.S. does anyone know what the correct value for focal length in an >> equirectangular image is? 0? This might be causing the above gap. >> > > For an equirectangular image use a hfov of 360 deg. Using the focal length > could result in small rounding errors and so deviations from 360 deg. This > could explain the gap. > On the photos tabs use the context menu on the image, edit image variables > and set field of view to 360 deg. > The full equirectangular images has an aspect ratio of 2:1. This is > recognized by Hugin automatically and the hfov is set to 360 deg. > But at least the image in your first link is not exactly 2:1. There are > some pixel missing: it is 1438 px × 722 px. Maybe this is the cause for the > gap? > > Thomas > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/40ab37c3-37b5-416c-b5cd-2c13f4b84ed9%40googlegroups.com.
