On 16 September 2020 12:22:49 BST, Paul Womack wrote:
>On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 09:13, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
>> It [TCA] would complicate the GUI, and stitching would take three times as
>> long. I'm not sure if there is demand now that some cameras do this
>> correction internally and it is available in all raw converters.
>>
>I think it would only increase the generation of the mapped images by three
>times. Stitching (enblending...), which is normally the slower process
>(at least for me) would be unaffected.
I'm not saying it couldn't be integrated if somebody really wanted it and did
the work, but Hugin is quite complex already. I also seem to remember it has a
different lens distortion model (possibly the lens model that panotools should
have had in the first place).
--
Bruno
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/5C833B50-DE19-48F3-8599-6DF2423BF8A4%40postle.net.
