Op vr 19 mrt. 2021 om 08:41 schreef 'Kay F. Jahnke' via hugin and other
free panoramic software <[email protected]>:
> Am 18.03.21 um 21:21 schrieb Harry van der Wolf:
> > I can't find the question backs, but you asked me about the speed after
> > your improvements.
> >
> > The current version is about 10-15% faster.
>
> Ha, that's nice to hear, Did you look at memory consumption, too? That's
> where I had hoped to see about 30% improvement , because I switched to
> single-float masks.
>
> Yes, that too. The memory usage went from 3.2GB to 2.7GB for the image
sets I used (sets of 5 brackets of 13.5MB).
With regard to the " --snapshot_threads=X".
That still doesn't work for me. I tested on linux on the master repo. I
have a 4-core CPU. no matter whether I set X to 4, 3 or 2. Always all 4
cores are used and it actually creates many more processes.
The command I use from my batch file is:
${LUX} -W \
--blending=hdr \
--snapshot_like_source=yes \
--snapshot_facet=1 \
--snapshot_prefix="${PREFIX}" \
--snapshot_extension=$SUFFIX \
--aeb_auto_brightness=yes \
--next_after_fusion=yes \
--build_pyramids=no \
--build_raw_pyramids=no \
--quality_interpolator_degree=1 \
--snapshot_threads=3 \
"${PTO}"
In this case you see " --snapshot_threads=3", but of course I did vary that
number.
Best,
Harry
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAGARPpsUEj_zTgsJvDntE76ZqP6%3D0kNC3gXCUZ_OZG8QPO8q2w%40mail.gmail.com.
