On Fri 02-Apr-2021 at 10:50 +1100, Terry Duell wrote:
On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 23:51 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
Has _anyone_ tested this? I'll assume that no reports of problems
indicates that everything is fine.
The last time I built libpano13 was for my update to Fedora 33 and that produced
the source package libpano13-2.9.20.tar.xz, this time I ended up with libpano13-
2.9.20-851-Linux.tar.gz and the rpmbuild spec file baulks at not finding
libpano13-2.9.20: No such file or directory.
I'm sure it's nothing to do with the source, just me not going about the right
way.
What I did was as follows:
Update the repo.
In my libpano repo, rm -rf BUILD, mkdir BUILD, cd BUILD, cmake ..
make package
which generated the libpano13-2.9.20-851-Linux.tar.gz package.
Hi Terry, there are still two build systems in libpano13: autotools
and cmake, I think the plan was to remove the autotools stuff after
this release.
To make a source tarball with cmake:
mkdir BUILD
cd BUILD
cmake ..
make package_source
The same thing with autotools:
./bootstrap
./configure
make dist
Though since this is a release candidate, we need to test the actual
tarball that we are proposing to release, i.e. download
libpano13-2.9.20_rc3.tar.gz from here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/panotools/files/libpano13/libpano13-2.9.20/
(rename it to libpano13-2.9.20.tar.gz if necessary) and build this.
--
Bruno
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/YGbii45mL9Xgck9Q%40postle.net.
