The stitching could be speeded up using multiblend.exe from David Horman instead of enblend, especially if many images must be stitched. As far as I know, the time for stitching with enblend increases with the square of the number of images, whereas it is proportional to this number with multiblend.
chaosjug schrieb am Samstag, 18. Dezember 2021 um 09:15:03 UTC+1: > Hi, > > I'm looking for the best way to do make 360° indoor panoramas. I'm using a > panorama head and the images align well. No issues there. > What I'm wondering is this: > I'm shooting stack with different exposure. Is that the right thing? I > need > different exposure when shooting against a window versus a dark part of > the > room. > How should I build the final image from that? I tried the "fused" and > "blended_fused" but it is not totally clear to me what is actually the > difference. Is it the order if stacking or building the panorama is done > first? > Or is there anything else to it? Which is better? > > When using "blended_fused" I get three intermediate panoramas with > different > exposure although there are 7 images in each stack. It is unclear to me > why > that happens. I get the following warnings: > enblend: warning: some images are redundant and will not be blended > enblend: note: usually this means that at least one of the images > enblend: note: does not belong to the set > > As I don't have a wide angle lens, I need a lot of images and thus it > takes a > lot of time to merge. Are there any tricks to speed things up? > > Regards, > Stephan > > > > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/3037a84b-2ea2-4ee8-98f7-669dbd9c1c4dn%40googlegroups.com.
