I have been wanting to stitch aerial images for a long time but never succeeded. But I guess it's not possible to stitch them because of parallax mistakes in the pictures. In your project it's probably a different issue. On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 1:23:32 AM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 5:13 PM David H <[email protected]> wrote: > >> it just defaults to a 90 degree intersection. I was trying to mess >> around in the parameters in the optimizer tab but nothing was working > > > It wouldn't normally default to 90 degrees. That sounds like something > you would need to force by turning off optimization of "roll". > > It is hard to guess what is going on without seeing the project. I'm sure > it could be fixed using just the images, but maybe there is a better way: > > >> >> >> The screenshot below is the output from Hugin overlaid on top of the >> aerial flyover index for reference >> > > I think you are saying you have an accurate graphic reference that (within > the projection you want) is not warped. > > I would include the reference as an image in the project and manually > (since it is too different an image format) place control points between > the actual images and the reference, so optimize can do the correct > computation, then drop the reference out (either entirely or by masking) so > it has guided the result without becoming part of the result. > > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/08fa03ad-42d9-4c65-9468-0cee4d9a5b8an%40googlegroups.com.
