I wish my panoramas came together as well or as easily as that one. After I emailed back the .pto with several garbage CPs removed, I tried stitching and the result is better than I've ever gotten without major effort.
The automatic CP detection sometimes creates a few garbage ones. If I remember correctly, all but one of your garbage CPs were on clouds. I never use the tool for auto removing CPs from clouds, but there is one. Likely it works. Many people also use the main control point table (from the view menu) sorted by distance, to identify garbage CPs. In the state you sent the file, the approach was hopeless. The highest distances were perfectly good CPs and the bad ones were down of few positions on the list. Likely after removing the ones on clouds and reoptimizing, the last garbage one would have stood out on that list. I didn't try that. In the control Points tab, the garbage CPs were so obvious, no real effort went into finding and deleting them (never works that way for my panoramas). Once the garbage CPs were gone, your panorama had a better fit than I ever get even after being sure all my CPs are perfect to a fraction of a pixel. Anyway, it is not an example for my enhancements to huggin++ for hard examples. But I'm glad I could help. And it is good for me to see examples demonstrating that my own are not that representative. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/cf8b2019-d83a-4cf6-be61-01a4962918dfn%40googlegroups.com.
