Hi, i tried it on my Chromebook under the builtin linux which is Debian 11. I tried creating a pano, viewing a pano and did some bracketing. That all works fine. I completely stopped with panos and bracketing so I had to take some old series.
One remark: when specifying files or a single pano on the command line, it doesn't accept spaces in paths or file names. Not even when I enclose them in double or single quotes. And the remark about the app image being "big". Those persons do not understand that you can create a universal 64bit intel for many platforms in one go which saves the developer a lot of time when developing open-source for his users (aa\nd him/herself of course). One developer can support a lot of users in one app image build run. Obviously they still work from floppy disks as modern systems have huge amounts of disk space. And then they produce a single (tif) pano of 200~250 MB based on raw/tif images of 20~50 MB each. And when you record a 4k movie at a 100 MBps you have a video of 1GB after a minute. What is that compared to a "small" appImage? I have had the same questions/remarks for two of my appImages where users simply only look at their own environment without even looking at the "shocking" size of the images and videos they produce. Harry Op vr 14 jul 2023 om 08:44 schreef 'kfj' via hugin and other free panoramic software <[email protected]>: > Ooops... misread the download counter - fourteen so far. So maybe you did > try? > > On Friday, July 14, 2023 at 8:41:36 AM UTC+2 kfj wrote: > >> On 14.07.23 00:04, David W. Jones wrote: >> >> > So sad to hear this. I've never been able to get AppImages, Flatpaks et >> > al to work on my Debian 11 system. And the idea of a whole huge >> AppImage >> > just for one pretty small application like Lux just seems like way >> overkill. >> > >> > Oh, well. >> >> What is this silly lament? Did you try? Actually, I can tell that you >> did not, because the download counter on my download page is still zero. >> So you just seem to have preconceived notions. And what do you mean by >> 'huge'? The AppImage weighs in at 11.7 MB, which is less than the MacOS >> dmg and the windows installer (both 13.8). In fact, these latter two use >> a similar technology to the AppImage. The AppImage I distribute was >> actually built on debian 11, so here's a good chance for you to get your >> first AppImage to run on your system. Just a hint: after downloading, >> you have to set the execute permission. Then just execute it. >> >> I'm also not sure what you mean by 'a pretty small application'. You >> surely can't mean it's functionality, so maybe you mean it's size? The >> Linux binary is 25 MB, and the packaging shrinks the data to less than >> half, even though it bundles a fair amount of libraries with it. >> >> -- > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/1d48568d-30b7-410c-8c47-4f216f516351n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/1d48568d-30b7-410c-8c47-4f216f516351n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAGARPpu_GaUd09BS0st9z9m5y8nWFYFSd5gYrOp29pkCDGOcoA%40mail.gmail.com.
