"multiblend is exceptionally fast compared to enblend (maybe 10x to 20x faster, as I recall)."
It's not a fixed increase. Enblend has O(n^2) runtime (it scales with the square of the number of pixels) whereas Multiblend is linear. I don't know of anyone who's tried a terapixel blend with both, but Multiblend should be on the order of 100,000 times faster :D "Hugin was used to combine the images of 2 cams in a panorama" For videos, you might want to consider Avisynth+ instead of Hugin. There are plugins for warping and fusing videos (I keep meaning to release an update for the latter). On Thursday 25 January 2024 at 23:43:59 UTC GnomeNomad wrote: > Thanks. I didn't know you had two cameras. Very cool! > > On 1/25/24 08:26, Maarten Verberne wrote: > > I'm not sure what you are asking. > > Hugin was used to combine the images of 2 cams in a panorama, used the > > template it created for the rest of the images. > > > > > > Op 25-Jan-24 om 5:40 schreef David W. Jones: > >> That's pretty good. How did you use Hugin in this project? > >> > > > > -- > David W. Jones > [email protected] > wandering the landscape of god > http://dancingtreefrog.com > My password is the last 8 digits of π. > > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/889c551d-ac21-4306-a792-0daf95169b93n%40googlegroups.com.
