"Ch. A. Herrmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We feel that it is not good if such changes have to be made
> individually and therefore suggest that hugs can be given an additional
> parameter to change the size of the control stack, or maybe, even a
> parameter to allow for a dynamic increase of the control stack.
>
> In the appendix, I send you his changes to the new hugs release.
This is great! I'll merge it in an give it a shot.
I'm not sure how much longer we'll be using the current evaluator - but
until then, this looks like a good idea. (The new evaluator will use the
new GHC runtime system which resizes the stack on overflow.)
--
Alastair Reid Yale Haskell Project Hacker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://WWW.CS.Yale.EDU/homes/reid-alastair/
