Alastair Reid writes:
> o fixity decls are optional
> I see no point in this. If you want to use something as an infix
> operator, you ought to give a decl that says so.
>
> The only reason not to do this is that it's be cool to by able to write:
>
> x `elemBy myEquality` xs
>
> which obviously wouldn't work if you had to declare the fixity of
> "elemBy myEquality"
Ummm... the Haskell 1.4 report says:
varop -> varsym | `varid`
qvarop -> qvarsym | `qvarid`
conop -> consym | `conid`
qconop -> qconsym | `qconid`
This would seem to disallow the syntax above. Does Hugs allow this?
--KW 8-)
--
: Keith Wansbrough, MSc, BSc(Hons) (Auckland) -------------------------:
: PhD Student, Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Scotland. :
: Native of Antipodean Auckland, New Zealand: 174d47' E, 36d55' S. :
: http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~keithw/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
:----------------------------------------------------------------------:
