Byron Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asks:
> Should Hugs (January 98) accept this:
>
> two = 1
> two = 2
>
> It does, but I dont think it should.
>
> However, I suppose that it's consistent with the treatment of
> function defns.
>
> any thoughts?
Strangely enough, it's legal Haskell!
So is this:
f [] = 1
f [] = 2
The right fix would be to detect overlapping patterns (of which your
example is a particularily simple case) but, as usual, this isn't
anywhere near the highest priority on our ToDo list (see Hugs news page).
Alastair
