> Dear all (and especially Hugs maintainers),
>
> it is not too nice if libraries have to depend on internal details of the Hugs
> distribution, but I assume they wouldn't if their author's had known any way
> around this. And, given that several very popular libraries were affected
> seriously by the latest release of Hugs, may I suggest that those libraries are
> added to the test-suite for Hugs?
Amen to that! Of course, there is the problem of what are the standard
libraries... At this point Alastair's "HGL" has now been ported to both
Windows and Linux, and to both Hugs and GHC, so it may in fact be ready
for prime time.
-Paul
_______________________________________________
Hugs-Bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-bugs
