> I would like to ask if it is done for purpose that the function > isAlpnanum is called isAlphaNum in Hugs. The online library report at haskell.org calls it isAlphaNum (not isAlphanum) so it looks as though Hugs is correct. -- Alastair _______________________________________________ Hugs-Bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-bugs
- isAlphanum Ryszard Kubiak
- Re: isAlphanum Alastair Reid
- Re: isAlphanum Sigbjorn Finne
- RE: isAlphanum Alastair Reid
- Re: isAlphanum Ryszard Kubiak
