> I would like to ask if it is done for purpose that the function
> isAlpnanum is called isAlphaNum in Hugs. 

The online library report at haskell.org calls it isAlphaNum  (not isAlphanum) so it 
looks as 
though Hugs is correct.

--
Alastair

_______________________________________________
Hugs-Bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-bugs

Reply via email to