> Can't we require that a local definition be more indented than the
> enclosing definition? That way my code would've been rejected by the
> compiler, and the error message (something like "Empty where-clause on
> line xxx") can actually be helpful.
The Haskell definition *does* require that nested definitions be more indented than
the enclosing scope, and empty where declarations are legal. Hugs doesn't follow the
report here.
Thanks for providing some evidence to support my view that this restriction on the
layout rule is The Right Thing :-)
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Hugs-Bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-bugs
