Thanks for reporting this. Hugs98 was in the wrong; now fixed. --sigbjorn
----- Original Message ----- From: "Duncan Coutts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 15:29 Subject: hugs / ghc difference over '(..)' imports > There is a difference between hugs and ghc in how they treat imports with the > '(..)' notation. Here's my example: > > module CTree( > --other stuff > Const(..) > ) where > > import ATree (Const) > > --const has constructors CInt, CChar, CStr > > under hugs this module exports CInt, CChar, CStr > but under ghc it does not. Under ghc it only exports the constructors if I > import 'Const' like this: > > import ATree (Const(..)) > > I don't know which is the right behaviour w.r.t. the H98 standard, but it > tripped me up. > > Duncan > _______________________________________________ > Hugs-Bugs mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-bugs _______________________________________________ Hugs-Bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-bugs
