Johan: > A reasonable compromise, although it wouldn't address the last two > examples of module confusion that Alastair reported.
Just to clarify: my problem was that I couldn't find any way of making Hal's example work. If there's been anything which worked, I'd have said it was a bug in the documentation or a bug in the user :-) If we can agree on anything which makes the example work in Hugs (and ideally is compatible with ghci or is also adopted by ghci) then I'll be happy. -- Alastair _______________________________________________ Hugs-Bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-bugs
