| | So, taking a deep breath, we have instead at least
| | provisionally adopted Plan B, namely to build an
| | interactive system on top of GHC.
| :
| | We will lose some of Hugs's excellent portability
| | (compile these 10 C files and away you go).
|
| How about Hugs' *extremely* fast compilation time? (Which is
| the main reason for me (and many others) to use Hugs.)
It won't be as fast as Hugs, but it will be much much faster than GHC.
No figures yet, though. Getting it 'fast enough' is probably the major
risk area.
Simon
