Trev  Your wrong.  Language does not rely on both a speaker and a
hearer.  Language can be written like a deaf person reads sign
language. Our brains understand pictures as well as math. Language/
grammer is becoming known as an innate (inbred) behavior in our DNA
and not a learned behavior.   This noise we hear could very well be
speaking
to our brains subliminal, in this reality that we all are living. I
don't think it would take
as much TO FORCE A MALIGN INFLUENCE.  That's why they call it
subliminal perhaps.

On Jul 21, 2:23 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Language relies on both speaker and hearer believing in the same
> reality.
> This is how conjurors work their magic by taking control of the
> interaction - but there is NO dialogue as such..
> Suspended disbelief and it is not far from fuzzy logic imo.
> Fuzzy logic is needed where the constaints are too far out of kilter
> with known ideas but some really new concepts are needed.
> I think that, Dee is where your vision operates and why I persist to
> struggle with what you see.
> I know what it's like when I've seen something others don't- the
> dialogue is non existent ,in truth, and a lonely path it can be too.
> As already said, I was technically 'trained' but no educated enough to
> really put my ideas into an acceptable framework. When I came to work
> in research finally, with multiple PhDs, I found them great
> intellectually, but most of their eyes glazed when moving away from a
> comfort zone of pre- assuptions and formal report writing concepts.
> The only true free mind was a guy writing a book on quantum physics
> which updated Einstein- and though he sent me a copy years later, I
> could barely scrape through the first chapter- the rest was, and still
> is, gobbledegook as we say here!
> Crop circles fall somewhere in between these margins, the possible
> genuine ones, at least promising new fuzzy logic ideas which ,by their
> nature, will seem odd or meaningless to everyday rules
> The false flag stuff [spoofed CCs] comes under conjuring tricks where
> the controllers [conjurors] have the upper hand and the fear of the
> new stops people taught only one 'official' language of what is
> permissible from stepping outside the box. This generates fear and
> confusion instead of insight, as intended.
> This is where CCs and Hum live alongside each other- but in order to
> communicate, you must find a common language or face a lone path.
>
> My initial answer to your view on 'Alice CC' is that it is fair
> comment that 3D is even more impressive than 2D- but what we need is a
> handle on 4D, which is what you're probably thinking about, when
> looking into your outer reality.
> Time flows, but only by reference to the 3D world of seeing and energy
> constructs we accept.
> To dis-integrate this reality would indeed take plenty of fuzzy logic
> party tricks by God [should you believe, otherwise- cosmic truth] and
> a few others beside , I reckon !
>
> My broad view is that it would take too much to support a malign
> influence theory and 'cock up' would be order of the day.
> 9/11 aftermath  does show that we can't be complacent though, about
> what is going on under our very noses!
>
> On Jul 19, 11:21 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > A language within a lang? A source code? Their are c's, a plus symbol
> > that looks like it's in parenthesis.Plus symbol inside circle, maybe a
> > new metacharacter?  Again I am just a layperson, but I do get around
> > research wise.  The lang: operator, which restricts by programming
> > language (e.g., lang:"c++", -lang:java, or lang:^(c|c#|c\+\+)$)
>
> >http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/faq_codesearch.html
> > What kind of code are you crawling?
>
> > 2. What regexp syntax does Code Search support?
>
> > Google Code Search supports POSIX extended regular expression syntax,
> > excluding backreferences, collating elements, and collation classes.
> > To search for a space character, escape it with a backslash, as in
> > hello,\ world. You can search for literal strings by enclosing the
> > strings in quotation marks, as in "hello, world".
>
> > We also support the following Perl extensions
>
> > \d   Matches a digit character.
> > \D   Matches a non-digit character
> > \s  Matches a whitespace character
> > \S  Matches a non-whitespace character
> > \w   Matches a word character. (alphanumeric plus "_")
> > \W  Matches a non-word character
>
> >   I noticed a number of D or d type characters in the crop circle, as
> > well as
> > s or S 's embedded in the parenthesis of some form.  The diagonal
> > lines of hash
> > mark lines in the parenthesis, a form of W's ?
>
> >   Or the plus symbol is a metacharacter asterisk form?
> > each of the operators can be used as a negative by placing a minus
> > sign ("-") in front of it.
>
> > :-:  make the dots bigger and there could be a minus symbol inbetween.
>
> >   It wasn't my intention to jump this far outside the box, but the
> > crop circle image
> > brought a number of meanings to mind.  I see other notation type
> > symbols
> > within it as well.  I also see some form of a question mark in the
> > other side
> > of the parenthesis.
>
> >    :-:   Symbols can be broadened like BOLD then tilted like Italics
> > and then
> >      they can press it all together and re etch it into different
> > morphs of
> >      different seemingly random broad/thin shapes within shapes.
>
> >    Most probably not what your eyes see, but that is what my eyes see
> > within that crop circle.  Different multi tech levels of machine code
> > meanings.
>
> >   I see a language within a language of some form.
>
> >  I realize this meaning of mine is probably far reaching for you and
> > probably too far outside of the box, within your concepts of putting
> > forth theorys that if the technology is not proven or taught in any
> > schools that we, as a group,
> > shouldn't think too much about those type of musing of theory's.
> >   By now, I would imagine, they have gotten pretty advanced on their
> > so called String Theory's?  But you won't find those answers being
> > taught anywhere
> > probably either.
>
> >   And this noise we hear, that seems to be some form of a
> > synchronization
> > as it swings it's way around the world, well it didn't get here on
> > it's own. And it's
> > traveling through different layers of matter.  Some days I muse, it
> > almost seems
> > like a perputual machine of sorts or possibly a perputual virtual
> > machine perhaps
> > that links us into this noise we hear. Perhaps a machine that has the
> > capacity
> > to learn. And like any good multi tech technology, someone has to
> > program the machine.  And as the machine gets more advanced, the
> > machine code used to program the upgrade probably gets more advanced
> > too.  A hierachy within a hierachy.
>
> >   Yes/No  True/False  0 1   Black/White of inbetween of fuzzy sets of
> > Gray,
> >   and the new metric logic gate of Go/No Go.    Hidden within the
> > layered data is unlabeled data.  All piled together but able to be set
> > apart or intertwined.
> > I muse that probably the same applies to sound transferred into data
> > bytes
> > and data bytes transferred into the seemingly random noise we hear of
> > sound
> > layers.
>
> >   But you asked and so I answered.
>
> >   Sorry so long.
>
> > On Jul 16, 12:10 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Re :  Circle @ West Kennet Long Barrow-28/06/07 (Wiltshire)
>
> > > I hadn't previously seen this shot. What is the meaning of this one,
> > > to you- Dee? it's quite old now.
> > > I was at a circle this year in the same spot !  Got rather wet from
> > > the crop.
>
> > >http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2009/westkennettlongbarrow/westken...Hide
> > > quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum 
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to