My initial reaction is that usage of neural pathways in these instances of peronailty 'fingerprinting' would have to involve use of an MRI scanner , or similar, to enable any feedback to be gained usefully. Difficult to apply 'in the wild', somehow. Mood altering though- certainly.
On May 21, 1:45 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > I doubt that those imagine abuses of this technique on private > citizens would become limited instead they would just find a different > neural pathway to use > and expand their techniques But that's just my opinion > > On May 20, 2:00 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, my comment reflected that ear wax , in particular is always > > altering ear profiles- even to the point of affecting hearing > > ability. > > Also, people can use plugs or music ear pieces to thwart misuse of > > their 'bits' at critical times! > > I would imagine abuse of this technique on private citizens would soon > > be somewhat limited by these factors. > > > On Apr 26, 1:02 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It seems to me they have taken into consideration what first came to > > > your mind > > > about this technology as the sound travels through the bones in the > > > ear > > > > It is thought that each person's hair cells produce a slightly > > > different noise, but as the sound travels through the bones in the > > > ear, the ear drum and along the ear canal, which are subtly different > > > in each person, the noise is changed further to make it unique. > > > Dr Beeby said: "Otoacoustic emissions have been used by the medical > > > profession for many years and anecdotally clinicians could tell > > > different people's traces apart. > > > "When we looked at it we found that otoacoustic emissions really are > > > unique from person to person. As the sound produced will change with > > > the signal put in, we can use standardised signals that produce > > > traces > > > that can be compared. > > > "It could be surreptitious as you don't necessarily know when your > > > emissions are being > > > captured.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/5219233/Ear-noise-can... > > > > Just because someone pretends to make something unsuitable for such > > > use > > > because of a so called license deal, does not mean they don't continue > > > using it > > > behind our backs Sometimes license deals are not always what they > > > seem > > > on the surface > > > > I do agree securing privacy does seem awfully low on their priority > > > list Invading privacy seems more higher on their moden day priority > > > list in my opinion > > > > Glad you found the link of some interest > > > > On Apr 24, 9:32 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Interesting link, Dee - > > > > Two things come to mind- Firstly this method of checking individuals > > > > will need regular recalibration as ear conditions vary from time to > > > > time. > > > > Personally, I think there is already more than enough intrusion into > > > > our lives on security grounds. > > > > 'Securing' privacy seems to be low on the list of modern day > > > > priorities! > > > > > Secondly, this could be very helpful in investigating Hum in people > > > > who get it ( or even don't) as even if it is an individual response to > > > > external stimulations(s) it will still validate the cause and effect > > > > mechanism(s). > > > > > Maybe, it will suddenly be found unsuitable for such use- probably > > > > under some 'licence' deal. > > > > You heard it here first, folks... > > > > > On Apr 25, 1:59 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Researchers have discovered that they can identify individuals from > > > > > the faint sounds made deep inside the human ear and are now developing > > > > > security devices using the technology. > > > > > >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/5219233/Ear-noise-can... > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Hum Sufferers" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Hum Sufferers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hum Sufferers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
