Here's something that I recieved from an academic in Scotland - You may
wish to evaluate its content:
* "The key to beating the situation is for us to stop falling into
the trap of using the term 'electrosensitivity'. I don't know who first
used this term but my belief is that it has been 'fed' to those suffering
as a condition to latch on to in order to explain what they (and we) are
suffering from.** *
* *
*Those in the 'know' have this permanent grin on their faces when this is
discussed in public because they know we have fallen into the 'trap'. We
are suffering from 'acoustic shock' and it is a recognised medical
condition. It can be caused by planes, radar, EM and infrasound. If you
measure noise across the spectrum you will find that we are being exposed
to extreme high dB outside the 'audible' range. This damages the system.
They know this but they also know we are unlikely to work it out because it
is outside the 'audible' range and also outside of environmental
legislation. However the condition 'accoustic shock' is medically accepted
*
* *
*I have measured dBA here at 45dB yet when I turn the meter to dBC I get
80dB. Yet it is not audible."*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum
Sufferers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/hum-sufferers/-/6xwueodFmq0J.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
