Post didn't get past me then, John. Do I get a prize ? :) On Sep 27, 9:57 am, John Dawes <[email protected]> wrote: > As I have always maintained any investigation worth its salt must begin > with measurement. You will see that none of items mentioned in the > collection of causes contain an actual measurement of the Hum. All the UK > government investigations into the Hum begin with the use of a microphone > and as we all know the Hum cannot be detected with a microphone, or any > acoustic equipment. In the past when I have been approached by the media to > make a comment about the Hum I always make the simple statement that this > is a noise that can be heard by people who are totally deaf and although > this is a know fact they never print or broadcast this, they always adhere > to the official government line. > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:46:18 PM UTC+1, Trev wrote: > > > Ahh- the famous Dr Geoff, again! > > I thought you were against his general blanket overview, John? > > > On Wednesday, 26 September 2012 15:59:11 UTC+1, john dawes wrote: > > >> I have attached a file that shows the Bristol Hum from the perspective > >> of the UK Government
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
