In view of the Budget Session of the Parliament recommencing tomorrow and the 
Union Government being reportedly keen to table the subject Bill, and also push 
it through, if possible; the following letter is sent to the Indian Prime 
Minister, with a copy to the ruling UPA Chairperson by the Coalition for 
Nuclear Disarmament and Peace (CNDP).Copies would be handed over to a number of 
MPs.
The letter is self-explanatory.
Sukla Sen14 04 2010

To 
Dr. Manmohan Singh Hon’ble Prime Minister,Government of India,South Block, New 
Delhi 110 001 

                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                               Dated: April 14 
2010 
Sub: Public Consultation on 'Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill 2010'
Dear Dr. Singh, 
We the undersigned hereby express our grave concerns at the implications of the 
'Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill 2010', copies of which have already 
been distributed to the members of the Parliament
The defining features of the Bill, as it appears, are as under:
One, it is an attempt to enact a law defining and tackling civil liability for 
nuclear damage, which does not obtain as of now, to facilitate participation of 
foreign players in Indian nuclear market.Two, the Bill is also a move towards 
joining the Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC) regime by enacting a 
law in alignment with that.Three, the Bill is a stepping stone to ensure entry 
of private players, whether foreign or indigenous, as "operators", as had been 
demanded by the FICCI in its June 2009 Report. And the Bill proposes to go way 
beyond the CSC framework to roll out a red carpet for he prospective private 
players to assume the mantle of "operator".
Our major concerns, in brief, are as under:
I. The entry of private players as "operators" is too dangerous given the 
unique nature of nuclear power industry and its catastrophic potentials, as 
chillingly illustrated by the Chernobyl Disaster on April 26 1986. The fact is 
that profit maximisation is the very raison d'etre of a private enterprise 
giving rise to the consequent innate tendency to cut corners in terms of safety 
measures. Regulatory mechanisms can at best only “regulate”. Hence, the 
envisaged ushering in of private players as “operators” of nuclear power plants 
is an open invitation to disaster.II. There must not be any overall "cap" on 
the quantum of compensation to potential victims. That is too unjust and 
inhumane. (The CSC, by the way, does NOT so obligate. Nor does it obligate 
entry of private "operators".) It has to relate to the actual damages caused. 
The overall “cap” of 300 million SDR, which works out to about 460 million US$, 
is even lower than the compensation
 amount of US$ 470 million ratified by the Indian Supreme Court to the victims 
of Bhopal Gas Disaster way back in 1989.III. The Bill pegs the “liability” of 
the private “operator” at Rs. 500 crore per incident, with the further proviso 
to lower it down to even paltrier Rs. 100 crore. And the state, i.e. the Indian 
taxpayers/citizens, will have to pay, in case of an accident in a privately 
operated nuclear power plant, the amount of “liability”, i.e. compensations for 
damages, exceeding the “cap” for a private "operator" subject to the overall 
limit of 300 million SDR. (Even in this case, The CSC does NOT obligate to peg 
the "cap" for the "liability" of any "operator" any lower than 300 million SDR, 
which amounts to around Rs. 2,100 crore or 460 million US$. And while the CSC 
obligates that must be a cap of 300 million SDR, it does not envisage any 
overall cap on the compensation to be made available to the victims by a member 
nation.)
 This is evidently a brazen attempt to favour private enterprises at the cost 
of Indian citizens.
Given such serious apprehensions and grave implications for the country, you 
are hereby urged to desist from any attempt to enact the Bill without detailed 
examinations of its various provisions. The Bill must be opened up for wider 
and transparent public consultations, just not among the parliamentarians, 
before any further step is taken to formally approve it.
Yours sincerely,
Achin VanaikND JayaprakashAdmiral (Rtd.) L RamdasAmarjeet KaurJ Sri RamanSukla 
Senfor the Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace (CNDP)

Cc: Smt. Sonia Gandhi Chairperson,United Progressive Alliance,10, Janpath, New 
Delhi 110 011 
Peace Is Doable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to