*UPA- One year after return to power*


*Ram Puniyani*





This May 2010, UPA completed its one year in the seat of power for the
second term. Now it is being christened as UPA II and political pundits are
evaluating its performance on various scales of performance, foreign policy,
economic performance, farmer’s suicides, foreign affairs etc. One point
which, does not find much mention while evaluating its performance, is the
plight of minorities during this year. The ground reality is that after the
Gujarat carnage and Kandhamal violence the minorities are feeling a great
amount of intimidation and fear, a curtailment of their democratic right to
equality. It is crucial that we weigh the performance of the ruling
Government vis a vis the overall security and equity of minorities.



One can observe that there have been hollow promises to uplift the condition
of minorities and to ensure proper rehabilitation and create a situation of
security. But major efforts in this direction are missing. The proactive
stance needed from the ruling government is no where in sight. One knows
that the health of the democracy has to be judged by the state of security
and equity of minorities. The only way to march towards a society where
religious identities are not the sole identities is to go through a period
where the religious minorities are ensured security and equity, a life of
dignity, which helps them overcome their helplessness so that the
overarching national identities become more important and more determining
in social and political affairs of the nation.



The victims of Kandhmal violence are crying for justice and rehabilitation.
The Government which was ruling when the violence took place continues to
rule without its partner the BJP, still the process of rehabilitation is not
adequate and the atmosphere of intimidation continues. Surely it is the
state Government which has the primary responsibility but the central
Government has a Constitutional duty to ensure that the spirit of National
Integration is preserved by undertaking steps for concrete protection of the
minorities. The doors of temples of justice for these victims do not seem to
be opening most of the time. The communalized police machinery and state
apparatus do not pay attention to these issues unless there is a political
will at the top. The political leadership at the top does not heed these
demands unless it fits into their electoral arithmetic. At the moment it
seems that this arithmetic does not favor strong, honest actions on the part
of the ruling establishments.



Gujarat by now has become a sort of ‘Hindu Rashtra in one state’ with
Narendra Modi getting stronger, politically more assertive. Despite the
claims of Swarnim Gujarat the minority community is living in the condition
of fear and intimidation to the extent that it does not even want to express
its anxieties, fearing further intimidation by the state.



The major problems faced by Muslim minorities are the economic ones,
insecurity and those created due to political under-representation. For
economic relief Sachar Committee has proposed many a measures, the UPA has
theoretically accepted them and the Prime Minister had the courage to say
that minorities have the first right on resources. But it has remained
restricted to paper only. The implementation of schemes for upliftment are
lacking the strong will power and putting in place the honest and committed
mechanism for the same, which is missing. The ghettoisation of minorities in
different cities is on the rise. Economic marginalization is visible all
around. It is because of these twin problems that the conservative elements
are finding bigger prominence in the society. A thriving community will
ignore such elements issuing fatwa’s like the one against women working
where they have to interact with men, but such elements assume prominence
only when the community feels intimidated from outside. We need all round
efforts for creating a social mind set which is respectful of all the
communities.



The Rangnath Mishra committee report recommending 10% reservations for
Muslims is kept in the deep freeze. The fear that this will create adverse
reaction from communal elements or will annoy a section of dalits is
preventing the action on this. What is needed is to bypass communal elements
and to engage with dalit sections to ensure that Rangnath Mishra report is
implemented while preserving the interests of those who are already the
beneficiaries of these provisions. The work on ‘Equal Opportunity
Commission’ seems to be moving with the snails pace.



The latest investigations into the acts of terror, like the one of Ajmer
show that Hindu extremist groups may be the one’s who indulged in various
blasts near mosques and dargahs. They were under wraps so far. Their parent
organizations are merrily operating, while the popular notion ‘All
Terrorists are Muslims’ rules the social common sense. The organizations to
which Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur or Swami Aseemanand belongs are doing their
activities unhindered and have already been given enough time to cover their
tracks. The methods of police, their line of investigation has fed into
these popular perceptions ruining many a young careers and lives of many.



On the top of all this two major moves, the one of Women’s reservation Bill
is again going to bypass the Minority women, as at present the social
situation is acting as a big brake on their coming out to demand for their
rights in full measure. The provisions needed to safeguard their
representation have been given a go by in the present scheme of things.
Secondly in the ongoing census the column of religion is missing. How are we
going to plan for the allocation of resources for minorities? Yes, in an
ideal situation religion of the person should not matter in citizenship, but
if a large section of society is in need of affirmative action, ignoring
this column in census figure will make it impossible in future to undertake
affirmative steps for their betterment.



The UPA II, seems to have reconstituted the National Integration Council but
its meeting is nowhere in sight. The importance which this issue deserves
seems to be missing in the efforts of UPA II. Surely it has its plate full
with many issues, but is this issue, the issue of National Integration, the
issue of minorities not important enough to be dealt with in all the
seriousness and commitment?





--

Issues in Secular Politics

III May 2010



For circulation/publication etc.



Web  www.pluralindia.com

Response only to  [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to